You can’t practice both Satanism and Judaism

The Times of Israel released an article today about Malcolm Jarry, co-founder of The Satanic Temple who happens to also be a “self-described secular Jew”, and about how The Satanic Temple recently opened a headquarters in Salem, Massachusetts (surprise, surprise). The article talks a lot about what The Satanic Temple does, and the progressive take on Satanism it pursues, but the main point of the article is how Jarry does not consider his Satanism to be in any conflict with Judaism. He apparently views Buddhism the same way. I’m not going to bother with this article’s understanding of Satanism, just the premise the centering around Jarry and The Satanic Temple.

The idea that Judaism is compatible with Satanism in any way, let alone for the same reasons as Buddhism, should be treated as inherently and patently nonsensical. First of all, Buddhism is an atheistic religion. Even the more esoteric forms of Buddhism, which are based off of Mahayana Buddhism and often involve magical beings, do not believe in a God. Judaism, however, is a monotheistic religion, the starting premise of which involves YHWH – you know, the same tyrannical deity that all Satanists are against and refuse to worship? Judaism is based on worshiping YHWH, and just like in Christianity the individual is part of a hierarchy in which God is above Man and subject to laws and commandments that suit an authoritarian God. Satanism, by contrast, has few hard and fast rules and is focused ultimately on the individual. Not to mention, one of the premises of Satanism is that, ultimately, Man is God.

Second, Jarry as a TST member seems to prize the idea of religious freedom . In Judaism, thou shalt have no other gods before YHWH. Even if Satan isn’t an actual entity in the Jewish faith, you are still revering Satan as a symbol, a symbol in opposition to YHWH no less. And engaging in ceremonies that no doubt would be considered blasphemous to all three of the main Abrahamic religions. And I don’t think the New Testament means anything in traditional Judaism, so the only God you get is the God of the Old Testament, and that God is fucking brutal. He wields totalitarian power over his creation, willing even to commit acts of genocide, and this is justified in Judaism just as it is in Christianity. Satanism rejects the totalitarian power of Jehovah/YHWH, it stresses individual freedom, as I said before. If you think that resisting tyrannical power and worshiping tyrannical power are compatible, you are engaging in obvious double-think. And if you don’t feel the same way about Christianity, a direct off-shoot of Judaism, then you are a hypocrite – plain and simple. You can’t win with this way of thinking.

Third, the article says this:

In addition to Jarry’s belief that Judaism and Satanism can co-exist, there are parallels with how Judaism and Satanism have been branded by their detractors, he said.

“The false accusations that have been thrown at Jews historically are similar to what some people say about Satanism,” said Jarry, mentioning accusations of blood libel and — more recently — fabricated allegations that Israel perpetrates genocide against Palestinian children.

How the hell is this even a parallel to Satanism? The only parallel here is that they’re both stereotyped, which in itself does nothing more than construct a victim narrative. And while the Jewish community is fine to craft a victim narrative based on identity politics based on a history of persecution, Satanists aren’t. We don’t desire victim status, so we sure as hell will not welcome any victim narratives. Not to mention, . This is the only parallel given in this entire article. If that’s the basis of Jarry’s claim of parallel’s between Satanism and Judaism.

Since he mentioned Buddhism as well, there are barely any parallels between Satanism and Buddhism either! Right down to the starting premise of a lack of individuated self or consciousness and a rejection of desire. His case is weak, and I suspect any Satanist would know this. But of course, we are dealing with The Satanic Temple, and it seems they are one of those types of people that’s all about inclusiveness, apparently. Typical progressives. It says a lot about a high-ranking member of The Satanic Temple that this, this, is what he bases the idea that two diametrically opposed belief systems being totally compatible as opposed to being defined by diametrically opposing philosophies.

Honestly, The Satanic Temple does good things often times (like recently alerting their followers to a fundraiser to pay for a victim of anti-Satanic conspiracy theorists to be given a proper funeral by her son), but this is just another case where it’s hard for me not to blast The Satanic Temple for, well frankly, being bloody ridiculous.

Link to article:

5 responses to “You can’t practice both Satanism and Judaism

  1. This sounds absurd to me too. He’s welcome to his personal opinion, but it just lacks coherence. I understand some of the parallel issue he is trying to pick out historically, but I really find that a red herring (I am just going by what you have reported here). All kinds of groups have been painted as “the devil” or “satanic” by a mainstreams that project on to them, and Jewish minorities in Christian societies have been one of those, but so have sects of Christianity. If he’s just saying that he takes “Jewishness” as a cultural, ethnic thing (not a religion), and that you can be a Judaised Satanist culturally, then I could see that, as you take whatever you want culturally into your Satanism if it works for you as an individual. But religiously Jewish and Satanist at the same time? I don’t see that. It seems to be fudging an issue.

    I’ve liked a lot of the things that TST has done, and they have kicked some new life into popular Satanism, but their love affair with being “progressive” inevitably ties them to an amount of collectivist mind sets that I do not think mix with Satanism, or even being properly liberal in fact.

  2. Ok you make the obvious point. Here is the rest of the story,the Nag Hammadi Library and other Gnostic Doctrines consider the Evil Demiurge YHVH to be the First Archon of Darkness and Samael which is another name for the Adversary. BTW, Satan literally translates to Adversary and is thought even in the Bible to be Title and Not a proper name.

    • I actually plan on writing a post about the Demiurge archetype as it appears in LHP circles in the (hopefully) not too distant future, so it is interesting that you bring up this point.

      However, for the purpose of this reply to your comment, it’s important to remember that YHVH is still YHVH in these doctrines, but he gets called Samael because, in Judaism, Samael tends to be the closest thing to evil incarnate, and by identifying YHVH as Samael, the Gnostics were trying to point out that, as they believe to be the case, YHVH and Satan are the same entity. It’s also important to remember that the Gnostic teachings were essentially heterodox Christian doctrine, but it was still ultimately a form of Christian doctrine. You are still not supposed to worship Satan in the Gnostic teachings. The whole point of being a Gnostic is to transcend the world created by the Demiurge, which supposedly he did in order to imprison the souls of mankind, and meet the true God, which would also be the real subject of worship.

      Gnosticism is not Satanism, and to be frank I find hard to imagine why some people put them together as I have seen. Gnosticism wants the practitioner to renounce this world in order to transcend it, because the world is evil. In Satanism, the world is not evil, but rather part of the basis of the belief system. One would think that a Demiurge who created the material world would get a slightly different reception within Satanic circles, particularly if that Demiurge is Satan himself.

      • I appreciate your prompt and thorough response. If I cannot wait to read your blog post about the Evil Demiurge. Certainly the Gnostics did not worship Satan but they were true believers in his power. Furthermore they did worship an unnamed Spirit who was Sophia’s husband. Their idea of God was not monotheistic at all even though they believed Jesus was sent by the unnamed Spiritual Father from Barbello. At least that is what I understood from studying the documents. Anticosmic Satanist have much in common with the Gnostics. Except that their allegiances are different. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s